An iGaming game aggregator gives an operator a connection to enabled games from multiple providers. Choosing an aggregation partner is therefore both an integration decision and an operating decision: your team needs a usable contract, the right game access, explainable wallet records and a clear escalation path when a session fails.
A large public catalogue is useful discovery information. To compare providers on a more practical basis, ask for evidence that matches the games, currencies and delivery scope you actually need. These twelve questions turn a general sales discussion into a review your technical and commercial teams can use together.
Game access: questions 1–3
1. Which exact games can our account launch? Request a workspace-specific inventory rather than relying on a logo list. Check the provider catalogue, then confirm entitlement for the titles you plan to feature. The slot integration guide explains why the exact returned launch identifier matters.
2. Which play currencies and markets are in scope? Ask for the permitted combination of account, provider, game and play currency. Your commercial operating scope also needs confirmation. The provider and currency reference documents Aggregator's access checks; funding assets and play currencies are separate concepts.
3. Which optional features are supported? Ask about trial launches, free rounds and any other feature your product depends on. Confirm support on the intended games instead of treating every title as interchangeable. A catalogue flag and a successful feature request are different pieces of evidence.
Technical fit: questions 4–6
4. What must our backend implement? Obtain the current authentication, catalogue and session-launch documentation. Compare it with your existing stack and operating controls. Aggregator's casino API guide connects these responsibilities to its current interface, with implementation examples for supported backend languages.
5. What is the wallet contract? Identify the system that owns player funds, how a launch reservation works, whether settlement amounts are deltas or snapshots, and how precision is preserved. Read the wallet settlement architecture before estimating the effort. A familiar label such as seamless wallet does not establish identical financial behavior across suppliers.
6. How are unknown outcomes resolved? Ask what happens if a launch request times out or a callback acknowledgement is lost. Agree which operation identities and ledger records you must retain. Recovery should follow evidence about the original operation, with documented limits on retries and delivery attempts.
Operational fit: questions 7–9
7. What evidence can support use to investigate a failure? Check the availability of request correlation, session records and callback delivery status within the agreed account scope. Decide who can access those records and how support requests are escalated. Staff should be able to share an operation reference without exposing API credentials.
8. Who owns catalogue changes and integration maintenance? Ask how removed games, changed capabilities or provider incidents are communicated. Assign ownership for refreshing your lobby, handling access errors and retesting affected flows. A unified API still needs an operator release and monitoring process.
9. Does sports use the same supported connection? Confirm the sports product and protocol independently. Aggregator's sportsbook integration guide highlights the current 9Wicket command-API limitation and the questions to ask before building. Casino catalogue access should not become an assumption of universal sportsbook support.
Commercial fit: questions 10–12
10. Which fees and funding requirements are separate? Compare activation purchases, the agreed GGR rate, operational funding and any additional contracted charges. Keep player balances out of that fee comparison. Start with published pricing and use the GGR calculator only with the applicable grouping and rate assumptions.
11. What is included in website delivery? If your proposal includes a supplied website, obtain the branding, domain, hosting, maintenance, payment-integration and ownership scope in writing. The ready-made casino website guide provides a delivery checklist. An API connection and a player interface are related purchases, with different acceptance evidence.
12. How do we finish or exit the integration? Agree acceptance criteria for launch and a reconciliation plan for termination. Clarify how open sessions, outstanding charges, reservations and records will be handled. Retained technical data does not by itself transfer contractual rights to game content.
Turn the answers into a comparable scorecard
For every shortlisted partner, record an answer, an evidence source and an owner against the same twelve questions. Mark an item as confirmed only when the scope is clear; an unresolved dependency belongs in the delivery plan. This makes proposals comparable without reducing the decision to provider counts or headline rates.
Run a controlled proof using one enabled game and your actual backend. Demonstrate catalogue selection, launch handling, signed settlements and an exception scenario. The sandbox-to-production checklist gives your team a concrete starting point, while the integration model comparison helps frame the responsibilities you are choosing.
When you have your game shortlist, currencies and delivery requirements, contact Aggregator Network to review the supported scope. Bring the scorecard to that conversation so technical access, financial behavior and commercial responsibilities can be confirmed together.
Written from the current platform API documentation and integration handbook. For access confirmation or a documentation correction, contact the integration team.